From Michael Moore’s Stupid White Men To Nigeria’s Foolish Black Elites

By IDUH ONAH

WHEN I first read Stupid White Men… and Other Sorry Excuses for the State of the Nation! (2001) in mid-2002, I was fascinated not just by Michael Moore’s deliberate deployment of humour, sarcasm, hyperbole, statistics, anecdotes and provocative language to excoriate America’s political and corporate power elites, racism, and inequality, but even more by his courageous outspokenness and clarity against an oppressive system in a state many people outside the United States of America (USA) may imagine impossible. I was also thrilled by the relative similarities in the elite manipulation of ordinary citizens in the US vis-à-vis Nigeria that Moore marshalled.

Essentially, Moore’s core argument in Stupid White Men is that many of the problems facing American society are not simply the result of individual failures but of institutions and powerful interests that protect themselves at the expense of ordinary people. He particularly attacks America’s ruling class, which he portrays as serving wealthy and corporate interests rather than the wider population.

It therefore occurred to me that though Stupid White Men primarily mirrors the United States, many of the book’s themes can be applied comparatively to Nigeria. The comparison should not be taken to mean that the two countries have identical political systems or histories, rather because Moore provides a framework for thinking about power and manipulation, inequality, corruption, political accountability and the relationship between the ruling elites and citizens.

For instance, one of Moore’s major concerns is the distance between political elites and ordinary citizens. A comparable Nigerian issue is the perception that political office can become a route to access to state resources, patronage and personal enrichment, rather than solely a means of public service. Since political independence, Nigeria’s political system has also been profoundly held back by entrenched corruption, lack of accountability and unfair distribution of public resources, amongst other social vices.

In this context, Stupid White Men can be read metaphorically in a Nigerian context as the powerful elite, not in racial terms, but in terms of people who possess political or economic power and use it in ways that disconnect them from the everyday experiences of citizens.

Moore, in Stupid White Men , repeatedly questions what happens when public institutions serve private interests. This has an obvious Nigerian parallel in the long-running problem of corruption and mismanagement of public resources. Funds budgeted for infrastructure, education, healthcare or social development are diverted or expended via inflated contracts and other forms of abuse.

Moore contrasts affluent America with people who struggle despite living in a wealthy country. Nigeria similarly contains a striking contrast between substantial natural and human resources vis-à-vis widespread socio-economic hardship. Nigeria is a major oil producer and, in addition to multiple solid minerals; yet poverty, unemployment, inadequate infrastructure and unequal access to essential services remain significant concerns.

Nigeria’s natural wealth represents the gap between what a country possesses and what its citizens actually experience.

In Moore’s book, corporations and political power are closely connected. In Nigeria, the oil industry has historically been deeply connected with government revenue, political power and debates over resource control.

Oil therefore functions as a Nigerian equivalent of Moore’s broader symbol of corporate wealth: who controls the resource, who benefits from it, and who bears the costs? This question is particularly relevant to the Niger Delta, where oil production has generated enormous national revenue while communities have also experienced environmental degradation and disputes over resource ownership and distribution.

In Stupid White Men , Moore is critical of citizens who are politically passive. This resonates with Nigeria’s democratic experience. Elections provide citizens with the formal opportunity to choose representatives, but democracy involves more than voting every election circle. It also requires holding elected officials accountable; demanding transparency; participating in civic organisations; questioning government policies; using the media responsibly; defending constitutional rights; and remaining engaged between elections.

The Nigerian relevance of Moore’s argument is therefore that citizens should not surrender political responsibility entirely to politicians.
Moore also attacks the media for sometimes distracting citizens from substantive political questions.

Nigeria provides a useful parallel because the media – television, newspapers (both traditional and digital), radio and social media – play major roles in shaping political discourse. Political propaganda, misinformation, sensationalism and partisan reporting can make it difficult for citizens to distinguish evidence from political rhetoric.

In fact, social media has intensified this problem: citizens have greater access to information, but they also have greater exposure to misinformation. The basic irony or contradiction here is that information itself is not the same thing as knowledge. A politically informed citizen must question sources, compare evidence and recognise attempts at manipulation.

Moore’s critique also raises questions about whether institutions actually empower ordinary people.

In Nigeria, education is particularly significant because education is often regarded as a major pathway out of poverty. However, are the protracted problems of inadequate funding, infrastructure, access, teacher quality, strikes and graduate unemployment.

Stupid White Men is fundamentally a work about power and its abuse or misuse. Its concept of a “stupid” person is not necessarily someone lacking intelligence but a metaphor for a person who possesses power but exercises it so ruthlessly or irresponsibly. Its “white men” are not simply a literal racial category; within Moore’s satire, they are a metaphor for an entrenched cabal of powerful people who, in his argument, benefit from systems that ordinary citizens have limited ability to control.

In Nigeria, the symbolism can be adapted from racial privilege to political and economic privilege. The Nigerian equivalent is therefore not “stupid white men” but the broader phenomenon of privileged, powerful but “foolish black men”; Nigerian elites in their dark covens of political patronage and corruption that perpetually continue to entrench inequality, social injustice and weak accountability.

The most important lesson from the comparison is not that Nigeria is the same as the United States; rather, Moore has, since 2001, provided us with a useful framework for examining a universal political question: when political and economic power becomes concentrated, what happens to ordinary citizens, and what institutions or civic actions can keep that power accountable?

Onah is the Editor-in-Chief of NATIONAL RECORD and writes this column every Wednesday. Send reactions via email to: nationalrecordng@gmail.com, onahiduh@yahoo.co.uk. WhatsApp: +234 8033209749