Alleged N11billion case: I did not see the appropriation law of the state between 2012 to 2014 before former governor of the state- Katsina AG told court

A witness and former Auditor-General of Katsina state, Alhaji Ibrahim Dabo Bujawa, has told Justice Maikata ibrahim Bako of the state high court that he did not see the appropriation law of the state between 2012 to 2014 before his committee came up with a report indicting former governor of the state, Ibrahim Shehu Shema of financial impropriety.
The state government had set up a committee to investigate the finances of the state under former Governor Shema.
The‎ committee was expected to investigate loss of government funds and property.
‎According to Bujawa, who printed posters to contest the 2015 governorship election against Governor Aminu Bello Masari but later stepped down from contesting the election in his evidence before the court said he was aware that the State House of Assembly is saddled with the responsibilities of making financial appropriation laws for the state but have not see the laws between 2012 to 2014.
Apart from the report of the committee that was brought to the court,‎ none of the primary evidence was shown to the court to substantiate the allegation of the witness.
While under cross-examination, he said apart from allowances that were paid to them, no other member of the committee got money for the work they did for the state in serving on that ccommittee.
But when asked by the team of lawyers of Dr. Shema, led by Chief Joseph Daudu, SAN, that some of the members who served on the committee have been rewarded with political appointments by the governor,
When asked, if he knew that Maigari Salihu‎ and Farouk Lawan Jobe, who served as members the committee are now, Chairman, Local Government Services of Katsina State and Special Adviser to the governor of he state respecctively, the witness claimed ignorance of the development.
Bujawa‎, who said he personally investigated the finances of the state said some vouchers were with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, but did not bother to request for the documents from he commission before coming up with its report.
He admitted that tthe documents with the EFCC was vital to the work but the not write them to request for it.
“I said that some vouchers are with the the EFCC. The Director of Finance in the ministry of Local Government and Chieftancy Affairs did not give us the details of the vouchers.
“‎The vouchers with the EFCC are very important to our work. I did not write the EFCC to request for the vouchers”, he said.
He also told the court that in the course of their ‎investigation, they never interviewed any of the defendant before the court, adding that the committee anly tried to reach one of them through a third party.